Colossians – The People and the Place (Colossians 1-1)

by Martin Wickens

Wickens.jpg

Colossae, a somewhat insignificant city in what is now south-west Turkey, situated on a rocky ledge overlooking the Lycus valley, held no insignificant believers. God does not abandon any of His children to the wiles of the Devil, but always sends help in their time of need. 

When Paul wrote to the church at Colossae he wanted to remind them of who Christ is and what Christ had done. This may oversimplify matters, but meditating on the Person and work of Christ will answer many of the struggles believers face. 

As Paul had witnessed many times before, false teachers had weaseled their way into the fellowship of believers at Colossae. By this time in Paul’s life, he had repeatedly reached out to churches in danger to try and settle disputes and correct error. He had written God’s Words to the Thessalonians, Corinthians, Galatians, Romans, Ephesians, and Philippians. 

Each letter had a focus, an arc of purpose which provided a theme for the epistle, but also tied together many other related truths. Whatever the theme may be, he always brought the believers back to a single solution, a Person, Jesus Christ. 

The focus in Paul’s letter to the Colossian believers was to settle their faith by reminding them that they were complete in Christ. And in so doing, their struggle to live righteous lives, which only found failure in their own strength, would be enabled and empowered by the grace of God. 

The error at Colossae combined false teachings from Jewish legalists, speculative Greek philosophers, and eastern mystics. 

The fellowship at Colossae was most likely founded by Epaphras (Colossians 4:12). The founding of the church at Ephesus and their subsequent outreach to the surrounding areas may indicate when the church at Colossae began (Acts 19).

Paul had led Epaphras to the Lord, and follow his conversion, Paul had discipled and trained him. We see the Great Commission fulfilling its purpose when a trained convert replicates what others have done before him, evangelism and church planting. One of the faithful families at Colossae, and who possibly helped plant the church, was that of Philemon.  

But issues arose that Epaphras felt ill-equipped to deal with, and so he turned to his friend and mentor, Paul. 

When Paul begins his letter to the Colossian believers he does so in the format normal for his day. Paul introduces himself and gives his credentials. He reveals two important truths. He is an apostle, and his office of apostle was ordained by the will of God. 

To a church led astray and sinking under the burden of false teachings, Paul wanted to simply bring them back to God. His message was all about the Person and work of Jesus Christ, and he acted according to the will of God. 

The troubles faced by the believers at Colossae were not unique, but rather they are common to many believers. If you are sinking under the burden of doubts and failures in your Christian life, then I urge you to read Colossians and meditate on Who Christ is, and what He has done. Find your rest in Him. And let Him empower your service to Him and others. 

Colossians – To the Faithful (Colossians 1:2-8)

by Martin Wickens

Wickens.jpg

Paul begins his letter to Colossae by encouraging the saints where they had stood strong. Paul addresses his readers as saints and faithful brethren. Though they faced spiritual struggles, he did not doubt their salvation. 

Saints

The believers at Colossians had formed a local fellowship of followers of Christ. Paul calls them saints. They were holy, sacred, consecrated to God. This title speaks of their union with Christ. Due to the prevalence of the idea that saints are just a select number of special believers, we need to always remember that every child of God is a saint, separated to God. 

Everything in life may change, but once consecrated to God we remain set apart to Him. Our role as parents, spouse, vocation, and our place in society may change. Yet our position as a consecrated child of God remains the same. 

Faithful Brethren

Paul also describes the Colossian believers as faithful brethren. This speaks of their union with other believers. 

Followers of Jesus Christ have a unique bond, we have fellowship, and not just friendship. God has bound us together not by common interests, but by adoption into His family, a shared purpose, and the same destination. Fellowship may include friendship, but fellowship exceeds friendship.  

When Satan can no longer hinder someone from being a part of a fellowship, he will seek to tear the fellowship down and make it ineffectual. 

It is vital that we remain thankful for one another, just as Paul expresses thankfulness for his brothers and sisters in Christ. Not only is Paul thankful for them, but he prays for them. 

When a body of believers gives thanks for one another and prayers for one another, it makes it almost impossible for the enemy to effectively attack them. 

We can pray for one another in a variety of ways, as Paul did:

  • Sanctification – II Corinthians 13:7 & I Thess. 5:23

  • For Love, Knowledge, and Judgement – Philippians 1:9-10

  • For Knowledge, Wisdom, and Understanding – Col 1:9

  • The Word to Have Free Course – II Thess. 3:1

  • To support in times of Affliction and Sickness- James 5:13-14

  • For Boldness in Sharing God’s Word – Ephesians 6:18-19

An important strength of the church at Colossae is brought out in verse 4. We read of their faith in Christ, and their love to all the brethren. Surely any fellowship will have hope and potential so long as they have faith in Christ and love for one another. 

The Great Commission

The church at Colossae had a hope laid up, or reserved for them, in Heaven. The word for hope here is translated as appointed in Hebrews 9:27. The hope of the Colossian believers was secure. As it is for each believer. 

This hope stemmed from the Word of Truth of the Gospel. One Truth, one Saviour, led to a sure and certain hope secure in Heaven. False teachings and false teachers only brought uncertainty and discouragement.

The Colossians had heard the Gospel preached by Epaphras, the Word of Truth of the Gospel. Epaphras receives high praise as a fellow servant and a faithful minister of Christ. 

The Colossians received high praise from Paul when we read that Epaphras declared to him their love in the Spirit. 

As noted in the previous article, this opening passage in Colossians reveals the Great Commission at work. Paul preached the Gospel at Ephesus and a church was planted. Epaphras evidently heard the Gospel there, or nearby, and was saved. He, in turn, took the Gospel to Colossae and a church was started. Now those Colossian believers were demonstrating faithfulness to Christ and one another, and they loved God and one another. So, the march of the Gospel continued.  

Conclusion

The believers at Colossae were faithful to God, to praise, obey, serve, and submit. 

The believers at Colossae were faithful to each other, they treated one another as Christ had treated them, prayed for one another, and met with one another. 

The believers at Colossae were known for their love, they were spirit filled, growing in Christ, and sharing the Gospel. 

We should endeavor to have fellowships of this sort. If we do, then even if challenges come, we will be well placed to confront them, deal with them, and move on to serve the Lord. 

Original post found here.

Colossians – The People and the Place (Colossians 1:1)

By Martin Wickens

Wickens.jpg

Colossae, a somewhat insignificant city in what is now south-west Turkey, situated on a rocky ledge overlooking the Lycus valley, held no insignificant believers. God does not abandon any of His children to the wiles of the Devil, but always sends help in their time of need. 

When Paul wrote to the church at Colossae he wanted to remind them of who Christ is and what Christ had done. This may oversimplify matters, but meditating on the Person and work of Christ will answer many of the struggles believers face. 

As Paul had witnessed many times before, false teachers had weaseled their way into the fellowship of believers at Colossae. By this time in Paul’s life, he had repeatedly reached out to churches in danger to try and settle disputes and correct error. He had written God’s Words to the Thessalonians, Corinthians, Galatians, Romans, Ephesians, and Philippians. 

Each letter had a focus, an arc of purpose which provided a theme for the epistle, but also tied together many other related truths. Whatever the theme may be, he always brought the believers back to a single solution, a Person, Jesus Christ. 

The focus in Paul’s letter to the Colossian believers was to settle their faith by reminding them that they were complete in Christ. And in so doing, their struggle to live righteous lives, which only found failure in their own strength, would be enabled and empowered by the grace of God. 

The error at Colossae combined false teachings from Jewish legalists, speculative Greek philosophers, and eastern mystics. 

The fellowship at Colossae was most likely founded by Epaphras (Colossians 4:12). The founding of the church at Ephesus and their subsequent outreach to the surrounding areas may indicate when the church at Colossae began (Acts 19).

Paul had led Epaphras to the Lord, and follow his conversion, Paul had discipled and trained him. We see the Great Commission fulfilling its purpose when a trained convert replicates what others have done before him, evangelism and church planting. One of the faithful families at Colossae, and who possibly helped plant the church, was that of Philemon.  

But issues arose that Epaphras felt ill-equipped to deal with, and so he turned to his friend and mentor, Paul. 

When Paul begins his letter to the Colossian believers he does so in the format normal for his day. Paul introduces himself and gives his credentials. He reveals two important truths. He is an apostle, and his office of apostle was ordained by the will of God. 

To a church led astray and sinking under the burden of false teachings, Paul wanted to simply bring them back to God. His message was all about the Person and work of Jesus Christ, and he acted according to the will of God. 

The troubles faced by the believers at Colossae were not unique, but rather they are common to many believers. If you are sinking under the burden of doubts and failures in your Christian life, then I urge you to read Colossians and meditate on Who Christ is, and what He has done. Find your rest in Him. And let Him empower your service to Him and others. 

The History of British Christianity – John Wycliffe (1330-1384)

By: Martin Wickens

Wickens.jpg

Following the rule of King Alfred the Great, the flow of church and state in England continued to grow. The life of Dunstan (909-988), who became the Archbishop of Canterbury, offers some interesting points demonstrating the development and expansion of the church. In secular history, much happened involving leaders such as King Cnut (990-1035). There was, of course, the Norman invasion under William the Conqueror in 1066. The Magna Carta (1215), a document which continues to guide our laws, society, and government was written and would eventually become part of statute law. However, I want to skip over a few hundred years to get to a man who has likely personally impacted us more than any of these. That man is John Wycliffe.

The Impact of Wycliffe
His Biblical teachings are primary in their influence upon us. But some of his more political comments have influenced the world we live in today. Many will be familiar with an adaption of this phrase he penned,

“This Bible is for the government of the people, by the people and for the people.”

Some say that John Wycliffe, the morning star of the Reformation, was a man born before his time. It is understandable why some would make that statement, but from another perspective, we have to conclude that God raised up this man at the perfect time.

Though we may find areas of disagreement with Wycliffe, perhaps some of his political views and his teachings on election/predestination, we will find much to agree upon. This has to be because we draw truth from the same single source, the Word of God. Drawing truth solely from God’s Word may be something we take for granted, but it was a radical step by Wycliffe in his day.

The Life of John Wycliffe

John was born in Yorkshire, England, in 1330. Few details of his life are known until he went to Oxford. He quickly earned a reputation as an exceptional theologian and spoke often in debates.

Unlike many at this time, Wycliffe regarded the Bible as alive and the sole authority for believers. He took the radical course of action of teaching through the whole Bible. He placed a strong emphasis on the power of preaching the Gospel and stated,

“Preaching the Gospel exceeds prayer and administration of the sacraments to an infinite degree.”

He was not minimising prayer as we know it, but rather the set prayers of the Roman Catholic church and prayers to saints.

As Wycliffe studied the Bible he saw and spoke out against the differences between the standards set in Scripture and the behaviour of many in the church.

Wycliffe criticised prayers to saints, pilgrimages, the selling of indulgences, confessions, images, celibacy. Another of Wycliffe’s radical beliefs was that each individual is directly responsible to God.

Wycliffe and Politics
At this time political tensions between the Pope and King Edward III were escalating, and Wycliffe, along with other Bishops were appointed to a royal commission to try and de-escalate the conflict. While other Bishops accepted bribes, Wycliffe kept his integrity and would not be bought.

At a time when politics and religion were closely entwined, his beliefs were clear. When the Pope put pressure on England to send taxes, Wycliffe helped draft a response in which he stated,

“Already a third and more of England is in the hands of the Pope. There cannot be two temporal sovereigns in one country; either Edward is King or Urban is king. We make our choice. We accept Edward of England and refute Urban of Rome.”

Because Wycliffe viewed the church to be in sin, he advocated that they should relinquish all material possessions. He believed that the state, particularly the king, should be the means by which the church’s possessions should be removed. He did not seem to view the state as being over the church, but that if the church was in sin, then God could use the state as a means of chastising the church. It is likely that some who opposed the wealth of the clergy used Wycliffe’s teaching in a less noble way than Wycliffe would have approved of.

In Wycliffe’s publication, On Civil Dominion, he made what many would see as an inflammatory remark:

“England belongs to no pope. The pope is but a man, subject to sin; but Christ is the Lord of lords, and this kingdom is held directly and solely of Christ alone.”

For this statement, Wycliffe was brought before a group of Bishops at St. Paul’s cathedral. Wycliffe had powerful supporters. Before the case really began a riot broke out between the bishops and Wycliffe’s supporters and the trial was disrupted and brought to an end.

Wycliffe’s stands on these issues seem to have given him popularity with many and won him some influential supporters. Later, when persecution was threatened this popularity may have shielded him to a degree. But this was not his plan. It seems even Wycliffe’s enemies recognised that he did not act strategically or with guile, but rather he always acted in sincerity and with integrity.

Wycliffe and the Scriptures
Later, in 1378, Wycliffe published another document, “On the Truth of Holy Scripture” and boldly proclaimed that the Bible is without error and is the ultimate authority in all areas of doctrine. Again, Wycliffe was brought to trial, but this too ended before it began when the King’s widow sent a message requesting that no verdict be brought against Wycliffe. So, as with many before him, Wycliffe was told not to publicise his opinions at Oxford or in the pulpit.

In 1381 Wycliffe rejected the teaching of transubstantiation and lost some of the powerful supporters he had previously enjoyed. The next year Wycliffe was accused of being a heretic by a group of theologians and the English parliament issued a bill condemning his teachings.

The Lollards, Wycliffe’s supporters, spread his teachings and ideas across England. Wycliffe’s conviction that the truth of God’s Word should be available to all people in their own language, and the conviction of the effectiveness of preaching, had led to the formation of this group of followers who would travel and preach around all of England. Many faced persecution and many were martyred.

Wycliffe retired to Lutterworth and continued to study and write. He rejected Latin, concluding that the people should have the truth in their own language. This led to Wycliffe instigating a translation of the Bible into English. Some believe two of Wycliffe’s followers actually performed the translation from Jerome’s Latin Vulgate. The translation would not be completed until 11 years after his death. But, for the first time, the Bible was in the language of the ordinary people. The academic influence of King Alfred remained and it is thought about 20% of the people could read.

Though the handwritten copies would be repeatedly confiscated and destroyed, they continued to spread until printed copies by William Tyndale became available.

It is hard, perhaps even impossible, for us to imagine the dependency the people had on priests and the church to teach them the Bible. And the priests and church were far from reliable or trustworthy. So, even if a person truly desired to know the truth, it was kept from them, hidden in a foreign language by a powerful organisation.

It is clear that as God was at work in and through His faithful saints, the enemy increased his fight in fierceness and scale against them. In previous centuries it was sometimes possible to give some benefit of the doubt to those caught up in Roman Catholicism, but now it’s decline into something truly antichrist is evident. One response from Roman Catholic Church described Wycliffe’s work this way,

“By this translation, the Scriptures have become vulgar, and they are more available to lay, and even to women who can read, than they were to learned scholars, who have a high intelligence. So the pearl of the gospel is scattered and trodden underfoot by swine.”

In response, Wycliffe wrote,

“Englishmen learn Christ’s law best in English. Moses heard God’s law in his own tongue; so did Christ’s apostles.”

Following a stroke in 1384, Wycliffe went to be with the Lord. But his influence continued and those who followed his teachings faced persecution.

The Legacy of Wycliffe
In 1401 a law was made that heretics were to be burned at the stake. Soon after Archbishop Arundel said that it was illegal to read the Bible in English. According to his ruling, no one could translate the Bible into English, nor should they read Wycliffe’s English translation. The penalty for both was to be burned at the stake.

Wycliffe served as a lightning rod to draw many to the truth and to challenge all concerning the authority of God’s Word.

In Wycliffe, we find a rare combination of intellectual brilliance, simple faith, and courage. He held up the Bible as the sole authority for believers. He taught that pastors should live simple lives shepherding the people, not lording their position over them. Though passionate about his cause, he is widely seen as a sincere and moral man. Where Luther’s anger would sometimes seem to get the better of him and lead him to make statements that would make modern preacher’s blush, Wycliffe appears to have held forth with more grace. When he did speak in abusive terms, he would confess it.

Although he had been dead for decades, in 1415 Wycliffe was tried again by the Roman Catholic church. The Council of Constance ruled that Wycliffe’s body to be dug up and burned. This ruling was agreed to by Pope Martin V and in 1328, 44 years after his death, Wycliffe’s bones were burned and his ashes scattered in the River Swift.

John Foxe in his book of martyrs wrote,

“though they digged up his body, burnt his bones, and drowned his ashes, yet the Word of God and the truth of his doctrine, with the fruit and success thereof, they could not burn; which yet to this day…doth remain.”

A journalist later described the burning and spreading of Wycliffe’s ashes powerfully,

“Thus the brook hath conveyed his ashes into Avon; Avon into Severn; Severn into the narrow seas; and they into the main ocean. And thus the ashes of Wycliffe are the emblem of his doctrine which now is dispersed the world over.”

Though his body had been destroyed, Wycliff’s teachings continued to spread. The people had a taste of the Bible in their own language and this brought a desire that would not be dismissed. The torch had been lit, and the foundation laid for the reformation.

Some Words of John Wycliffe

“All Christian life is to be measured by Scripture; by every word thereof.”

“This Bible is for the government of the people, by the people and for the people.”

“The higher the hill, the stronger the wind: so the loftier the life, the stronger the enemy’s temptations.”

“The gospel alone is sufficient to rule the lives of Christians everywhere – any additional rules made to govern men’s conduct added nothing to the perfection already found in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.”

“I believe that in the end the truth will conquer.”

“No man is to be credited for his mere authority’s sake, unless he can show Scripture for the maintenance of his opinion.”

“Trust wholly in Christ; rely altogether on his sufferings; beware of seeking to be justified in any other way than by his righteousness.”

“You say it is heresy to speak of the Holy Scriptures in English. You call me a heretic because I have translated the Bible into the common tongue of the people. Do you know whom you blaspheme? Did not the Holy Ghost give the Word of God at first in the mother-tongue of the nations to whom it was addressed? Why do you speak against the Holy Ghost? You say that the Church of God is in danger from this book. How can that be? Is it not from the Bible only that we learn that God has set up such a society as a Church on the earth? Is it not the Bible that gives all her authority to the Church? Is it not from the Bible that we learn who is the Builder and Sovereign of the Church, what are the laws by which she is to be governed, and the rights and privileges of her members? Without the Bible, what charter has the Church to show for all these? It is you who place the Church in jeopardy by hiding the Divine warrant, the missive royal of her King, for the authority she wields and the faith she enjoins.”

This article first appeared on Reach the Isles.

The History of British Christianity – King Alfred (600-800 A.D.)

By: Martin Wickens

Wickens.jpg

Missionaries and kings, individuals and groups, gradually brought the Christian faith to these isles and Christianity was firmly established here by the 5th and 6th century. Numbers and influence ebbed and flowed, and the visible church was predominantly Roman Catholic, led from Christian centres in Canterbury and York.

It is thought that Augustine’s mission in 597 A.D. set the course for much of Christian history in these isles by forming a close relationship between Christianity and the monarchy. The focus of this article will demonstrate that further and show its progression.

As noted in the previous three articles, the numbers who were truly born again, as opposed to those who were merely cultural Christians, is hard to know. But compromise certainly abounded during the 5th, 6th and 7th centuries. The historian, Bede, talks particularly of the half-hearted Anglo-Saxon Christians who still held on to Pagan practices.

Whether a church made up of those who possessed Christ or only professed to know Christ existed, the truth is that it did grow in numbers and influence. To many, its increase appeared unstoppable.

Then came the Vikings.

The Vikings came down from Norway, Denmark and Sweden. They had been increasing in power from about 700 A.D. and through their advances in shipbuilding were able to travel to nearby countries to pillage and plunder (and some setup homes and farm).

The Vikings were a pagan, polytheistic people. Their attacks monasteries had more to do with the wealth they often held rather than the fact they were Christian.

Once they settled in Britain and other countries, many quickly adopted Christianity and abandoned their paganism.

Lindisfarne and the Vikings – 871 A.D. 

In 871 A.D. the famous Viking raid on Lindisfarne shook the nation and many attacks followed.

At the time Alfred was the King of Wessex. He professed to be a Christian and in his understanding, the Viking attacks were a punishment allowed by God.

The battles between the Vikings and Alfred and his armies raged for over 15 years. Many of them in around my home county of Berkshire. At one stage Alfred was forced to retreat to the Somerset marshes and waged guerrilla warfare for a time. It was during this time he infamously burnt some cakes.

Alfred rebuilt his forces and in 886 A.D. had defeated the Danes and a treaty was established. One of the terms of the treaty was that Guthrum, the pagan king of the Danes, be baptised as a Christian, with Alfred as his sponsor. Though it seemed for a time that paganism would crush Christianity, once more the name of Christ was raised high.

King Alfred, born in Wantage near Oxford in 849, would become the only English monarch to have “the Great” appended to his name. He would also be the first monarch referred to as the King of England.

Alfred the Great and His Impact Today

He was a brilliant tactician and his efforts to fortify the country through burhs (boroughs) and an interconnected road system continues to impact our society and culture today. King Alfred also established a code of laws and believed strongly in education for all. He learned Latin in his late 30’s and helped translate books from Latin to Anglo-Saxon.

We accept Alfred had short-comings, and two especially come to mind. Alfred remained an adherent of Roman Catholicism. While this was not Catholicism as we know it, it certainly was compromised even in his day. Also, Alfred commissioned a project to trace his genealogy back to Adam. This, the writings of Bede and a growing belief by the Anglo-Saxons led them to believe the English were the new chosen people.

But Alfred’s determination to educate the English people and provide the Bible in the people’s language was something later genuine reformers, such as Wycliffe, would embrace.

The King’s new law code began with the Ten Commandments, and no doubt this went a great way towards establishing what we now refer to as our Judeo-Christian heritage. A heritage which has impacted our society, judicial system, economy and even work ethic.

Alfred’s efforts to educate enabled a system of learning that would bring at least knowledge of Christianity to all the people in his kingdom. Alfred had a noble goal for individuals to embrace Christianity and not merely to follow the lead of their rulers.

In the 10th century, Alfred’s work would lead to lords providing small chapels on their land where local people could attend. This eventually brought about the parish system familiar to any in the country today.

His faith was imperfect, and perhaps was not a born-again believer at all, but there is much about his life that we can appreciate, and through his leadership, we find yet more roots in bringing about the country we know from more recent history and our society today.

If God could use pagan kings like Nebuchadnezzar (Danil 4), Cyrus (Isaiah 44:28, 45:1) and Artaxerxes (Ezra 7:11-28) in the Old Testament, then I fully believe He can use a king like Alfred.

One of the benefits of studying church history is to see and understand that God has used many ways to work out His purposes in these isles.

This article first appeared on Reach the Isles.

The History of British Christianity – Rebels, Royalty, and Revival (300-600 A.D.)

By: Martin Wickens

Wickens.jpg

We would find the British Isles of 1500 years ago unrecognizable in many ways, yet in others, the seeds of the nations and society we live in today were taking root.

The edges of our island nations have been eroded over the years, but the major geographical features of the country remain the same. Accounts of vineyards during the times of the Romans indicates Britain had a warmer climate, and in parts of the country, less rain fall. Consequently, the fauna and flora may have varied, but only slightly. We know massive efforts to build the nation’s navy in later years meant the woods and forests that once covered the island were depleted, but large forests sometimes replaced the old.

So, many things may appear different, but much remains the same. As it is with the landscape, so it is with our religion and society.

A familiar issue that connects modern and ancient times is a constant battle with heresy.

Another recognizable feature of modern society which also began in those ancient times is the link between the monarchy and the church

A final thread that will weave its way through this post connecting 1500 years ago with today is revival.

Rebels (360-418 AD)

Blogs abound today that spend their time naming and shaming false teachers. Some do so in an edifying manner and are worthwhile. Others are harsh in spirit and do more to harm than to help. Something I have never seen, however, is the use of poetry to describe a false teacher. Here are two poems written against an ancient rebel, written over 1000 years apart.

The first poem is quoted in Bede’s “Ecclesiastical History of the English People”,

“Against the great Augustine see him crawl,

This wretched scribbler with his pen of gall!

In what black caverns was this snakeling bred

That from the dirt presumes to rear its head?

Its food is grain that wave-washed Britain yields,

Or the rank pasture of Campanian fields.”

This later poem dates from the 17th century and was found on a Calvinist print,

“Accurst Pelagius, with what false pretence

Durst thou excuse Man’s foul Concupiscence, Or cry down Sin Original, or that

The Love of GOD did Man predestinate.”

Though some now question the authenticity of the attacks made on Pelagius, he has had a false teaching named after him, Pelagianism. His contemporaries describe him as British in origin. Though Jerome describes him as “stuffed with Irish porridge”, so perhaps he was Irish. This statement refers to his tall and overweight appearance. Condemned as a heretic, his written work was largely destroyed and most of what we know of him comes through quotes by his opponents.

Pelagianism, whether popularized by Pelagius or merely attributed to him, denies that we are sinners by nature and affirms that we may earn salvation by good works.

If we allow for the historical view on Pelagius, then it is apparent that from its earliest days the church in Britain and Ireland had to deal with the false teachings of rebels.

Royalty

The genuine conversion of much of Britain to Christianity while under Roman rule may be questionable as it did not seem to truly take root. In 410 AD when the Romans withdrew from the British Isles, the native peoples were left to defend themselves against the Saxons and Christianity in those areas went into decline. The pagan Saxon tribes settled along the southern coast, but thankfully, many outside of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms remained Christian.

These early British churches developed independently from Roman Catholicism and were helped and influenced by missionaries from Ireland, which was also independent of Rome.

Sometime between 560-590 the pagan King Ethelbert of Kent, great-grandson of the first king of Kent, married Bertha, the Christian daughter of one of the kings of the Franks, Charibert I, King of Paris.

When Bertha married she brought with her a Bishop named Liudhard. It is thought they restored St. Martin’s Church in Canterbury which dated back to Roman times.

Though King Ethelbert was a pagan, he believed in freedom of religion and tolerated his wife’s Christianity. Under her influence, and perhaps that of the Kentish court, Ethelbert, according to some sources, asked Pope Gregory to send them a missionary. Some attribute the sending of missionaries to Pope Gregory himself after he saw fair haired slaves from Briton in a Roman slave market.

Whatever the motivation or whoever initiated the idea, a missionary was sent, Augustine, later referred to as Augustine of Canterbury (not to be confused with the earlier Augustine of Hippo).

Augustine would come to be known as the Apostle of the English and “founder of the English Church”. The latter is a somewhat misleading title as the church already existed in Britain. However, because they had struggled to withstand the pagan Saxons, the Gregorian Mission pioneered by Augustine is often pointed to as the beginning of the English church’s formal history.

In 597 AD King Ethelbert welcomed Augustine to Kent, but would only do so in the open air as he feared Augustine had magic powers.

King Ethelbert soon converted to Christianity and gave authority and land to Augustine.

Augustine would become the first Archbishop of Canterbury, an impressive cathedral would be built in Canterbury in 597 AD but completely rebuilt in 1070-1077 and extended in later years, and the Archbishop of Canterbury continues to this day to be the head of the denomination of the Church of England.

Augustine had been commanded by Pope Gregory I to purify rather than destroy the pagan temples and customs, and a tragic result was the incorporation of many pagan festival and rites into “christian” feasts.

King Ethelbert’s efforts resulted in the conversion of the East Saxons and this resulted in the first church of St. Pauls to be built in London.

Since this time there has been a clear link between the British monarchy and Christianity.

Revivals

No doubt a remnant of believers remained in Kent from the times of the Romans. However, they do not seem to have held any prominence.

In 598 Pope Gregory wrote to the Patriarch of Alexandria that 10,000 Christians had been baptised in England.

An important detail to note about these baptisms, is that the individuals were not commanded to convert as often happened when an ancient king changed his beliefs, but they seem to have become converts by choice. While the numbers are perhaps exaggerated and in many mass conversions some are not genuine, we could perhaps point to this as the first revival or awakening on the British Isles.

Prior to and during the time of Pope Gregory I error had certainly spread into the Roman Catholic church. Here are some examples,

  1. Use of images in worship – 375 A D.
  2. The Mass as a daily celebration – 394 AD
  3. Beginning of the exaltation of Mary; the term, “Mother of God” applied at Council of Ephesus – 431 AD.
  4. Extreme Unction (Last Rites) – 526 AD
  5. Doctrine of Purgatory (Gregory I) – 593 AD
  6. Prayers to Mary & dead saints – 600 AD

However, sometimes we can see the Gospel still being clearly presented and we can only hope that those who converted in the days of Ethelbert were genuine believers.

Conclusion

Events from 1500 years ago have certainly impacted us today, for good or for ill. We too face Rebels, the Royal connection with religion often leads Briton’s to settle for cultural Christianity rather than genuine conversion, and we hope, pray and work for revival.

Some people dismiss church history as unimportant, and perhaps in the grand scheme of things it does not hold the importance of other subjects, but an understanding of errors of the past and of bad decisions which have led to compromise and generations taking the wrong path can greatly aid us today.

Finally, as we reflect on revivals and mass conversions of the past, we may, with hope, pray and work to see the same outpourings of God’s spirit in our own day.

This article first appeared on Reach the Isles.

The History of British Christianity - Celebrating the Unknowns (100-300 A.D.)

Wickens.jpg

By: Martin Wickens

Looking back through the mist of time to find the earliest believers in the British Isles challenges historians. Especially as some medieval and modern authors have been found to bend or invent the truth to make England’s Christian roots seem established earlier than they perhaps truly were. You can read more about this issue in the previous article, “Facts and Fiction”.

The Spread of Christianity
As Paul, Peter, Stephen, Barnabus and other missionaries preached the Gospel, the church quickly and miraculously spread across the Roman empire. But the unrecorded lives of individual believers and their families must not be underestimated. Though the recorded spread of Christianity might be sparse, it is almost certain that believers migrating due to work or persecution would have spread the Gospel further than official records reveal.

In this article, I want to take a look at what we know through ancient writers, but celebrate the unwritten record which truly made an impact.

Lucius – AD 156

The Venerable Bede, our first church historian, wrote that in AD 156 a British King, Lucius, wrote to Pope Eleutherus, essentially extending the British equivalent of a Macedonian call. Bede states that,

“This pious request was quickly granted, and the Britons received the Faith and held it peacefully in all its purity and fullness until the time of the Emperor Diocletian.” (Ecclesiastical History of the English people, Chapter 4)

Diocletian – AD 303
In AD 286 Diocletian and the less-well-known Herculius became co-Emperors over the Roman Empire. Both persecuted the church, one in the east and the other in the west. They ordered all churches to be destroyed and all Christians to be killed.

Since Nero, persecution of believers had swept through the empire on nine occasions, and this made the tenth. This tenth persecution continued for ten years. Bede summarises this period of persecution with a note of victory,

“But at length, the glory of these martyr’s devoted loyalty to God was to light even Britain.” (Ecclesiastical History of the English people, Chapter 6)

Alban – AD 304
One example is Alban. When a fleeing priest came to Alban’s door he gave him refuge. The example of the priest challenged the pagan and he soon renounced his idolatry and received Christ as his Saviour.

The authorities received a report that Alban was harbouring a Christian and soldiers were sent. When they arrived Alban had put on the priest’s robe and went himself as the prisoner instead of the fleeing believer who had become his teacher and friend.

The judge who was to preside over the judgment of the priest was offering a sacrifice to idols when Alban was brought in. The judge had the soldiers drag Alban to the altar and stood him before the idols. As Alban had concealed a “rebel” and, worse, confessed to be a Christian himself, the judge condemned Alban to suffer all the tortures planned for the priest.

The pain of torture did nothing to dissuade Alban and the judge, now in a rage, commanded that he be taken out and beheaded.

At this point in the record, the facts appear to become mixed with legend. There is a story of a river running dry to enable Alban to quickly get to his place of execution. If I ever am approaching martyrdom I might prefer a miracle that delivers me from the executioner, not deliver me more quickly to him. When they arrived at the top of a hill where the execution was to take place, we read of Alban’s prayer for water being answered by a spring of water appearing at his feet. Finally, the moment arrived when Alban gave his life to testify of Jesus Christ. Of the second executioner, it is said that when he beheaded Alban that his eyes fell out. The first executioner had been so moved by Alban’s example that he converted and was also beheaded. This is the reason for a second executioner being required.

The execution took place at Verulamium on June 22nd, about 20 miles north of London. Today there is a city there called St. Albans and a cathedral is built over the spot he is said to have been martyred.

Constantine – AD 313
Despite the vicious and comprehensive persecution under Diocletian, when Constantine supposedly converted there were still many professing Christians.

In AD 313 a church council in France had three representatives from England, Eborious of York, Restitutus of London and Adelius of Caerleon (Gwent).

This demonstrates that there was a considerable Christian community in England.

Born Again Christians or Cultural Christianity?

Any consideration of church history must take the time to discern between cultural Christianity and genuine, born-again believers.

Though many of the heresies taught by Roman Catholicism did not begin until a couple of centuries later, the purity of the English church at this time had certainly been weakened.

The Nicene Creed, compiled in AD 325, but clarified due to heresies in 381 and 589, gives an insight into what they believed:

“I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

“And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.

“Who, for us men for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the virgin Mary, and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate; He suffered and was buried; and the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and sits on the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead; whose kingdom shall have no end.

“And I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of Life; who proceeds from the Father [and the Son]; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets.

“And I believe one holy catholic and apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; and I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.”

Up until the final paragraph, we would have no problems. And even with the final paragraph there is debate as to what exactly was meant by “baptism for the remission of sins…”

So, as noted before, the church in England could still have been largely pure doctrinally, but it was certainly being weakened by its marriage with the world through the actions of Constantine.

An Application for Believers Today

  1. The Unwritten Records – As with our first article, we are still covering a time where records are difficult to verify. However, we can be certain that in the history books of Heaven we will find the names of those first Christians who evangelised the British Isles as they travelled as soldiers, farmers, families, and politicians.
  2. The Unknown Martyrs – Some stories of martyrs are well recorded and over time miraculous events have been added to the narrative. But even if we sent them aside, we know there were many who gave their lives as they witnessed for Christ. These early saints lived and died in such a way that the world had to change the word martyr to mean more than just a testimony, but one who testified even by their deaths.
  3. The Unfinished Story – Through social media, blogs and digital records we retain much more of daily events and individual lives than at any other time in history. However, the vast majority of believers will not have books written of them, movies recounting their heroics or cathedrals built on the site of their martyrdom. In truth, a true believer would wish for none of those things anyway. However, it is the simple lives of regular believers as that can impact a country more deeply than you realise. By God’s grace live in such a way that impacts history, not in the books or the 10 O’clock news, but in changed lives, families, communities and countries.

The legacy of church planters and pastors today is rarely seen in stories etched in stone or printed on paper, but in the lives lived and changed for eternity.

This article first appeared on Reach the Isles.

 

The History of British Christianity – Facts and Fiction (100-200 A.D.)

By: Martin Wickens

Baptist Writers.jpg

The definition of what constitutes a Christian nation generates endless debate. But regardless of the definition, many claim that parts of the British Isles have been a Christian nation for millennia.

Over several articles, I want to survey the history of Christianity in the British Isles, particularly in the south of England where possible, and consider what lessons we can learn. It will not always be possible to point to local fellowships that we might identify 100% with today in doctrine and practice. However, we will find groups and individuals that recognized Jesus as the Christ, the Son of Man and Son of God, born of a virgin, who lived a perfect life, died as the perfect sacrifice and who rose victorious three days later from the grave.

First, we will consider some facts and then we will throw in some fiction before drawing some conclusions and applications.

Paul arrested and sent to Rome.
In Acts 21 a chain of events began that led to Paul traveling to Rome as a prisoner. False allegations were made in Jerusalem, there was an uproar among the people and the Roman officials had to step in. Paul was placed under guard and taken to Herod’s Palace in Caesarea. During his time of imprisonment and interrogation, Paul made his appeal to have his case heard by Caesar. And so Paul the Apostle was taken to Rome, arriving there sometime in the year A.D. 60.

Caractacus arrested and sent to Rome.

Now we move the scene to ancient Catuvellauni, modern-day southeast England during the same time period. The Celtic ruler, Caractacus (also referred to as Caradog in Welsh, possibly the origin of the King Arthur myth), followed his Uncle’s example and expanded his kingdom into the territory of the Atrebates. The Atrebate’s chieftain, Verica, fled to Rome and appealed to Emperor Claudius for help. Claudius decided it was time for regime change in the British Isles and the appeal from Verica was the excuse he needed to invade ancient Briton.

Caractacus led a fierce and sometimes successful resistance. In set battles, his men stood little chance against the Roman Legions but when using guerrilla tactics Caractacus had some success. Ultimately, in AD 51, Caractacus was defeated, betrayed and he and his family were taken as prisoners to be displayed as a war prize in Rome.

Caractacus was given the opportunity to speak before the Senate, and following a moving speech he and his family were pardoned and freed to live in Rome.

“History became legend. Legend became myth…”
Now, thanks to Iolo Morganwg (the 1700’s) and others, the facts turn to fiction, myth, and legend.

The story goes that Caractacus’ daughter, Gladys, changed her name to Claudia and married Pudens. The leap is then made to connect this Claudia and Pudens to the individuals mentioned in 2 Timothy 4:21. The connection is partly made because Caractacus, Claudia, and Paul all resided in Rome at the same time.

Depending on the story you read, either Caractacus or his daughter returned to the British Isles with the Gospel. Some say Joseph of Arimathea came to the south of England with the Gospel and that through his ministry Caractacus was a Christian before traveling to Rome.

There are other traditions about bishops and missionaries spreading the Gospel in the British Isles in the 1st and 2nd centuries. Some are debunked by experts. Others are based upon facts, but the facts are open to interpretation.

The more you delve into this subject the greater the degree of fantasy and imagination.

I want to establish several points:

  • Though the exact dates are not known, Christians have been in the British Isles for millennia.
  • Up until recent times, there has been a desire to trace the connection to Christ back as far as possible.
  • People have gone to great lengths to paint the UK as a Christian nation.

Where are we today? And what does any of this have to do with this church planting, evangelism and discipleship group?

Has God Finished with these Isles?
With such a long history, and having enjoyed so many privileges, does the current trend away from God indicate God is no longer at work here? Some refer to parts of Europe as being “burned over”. They say that great works were done here, but now people are “sinning away their day of grace” and God is choosing to work in other parts of the world.

I know of no Biblical premise for this position and on that basis alone I reject it. Also, God is still calling His people here to proclaim the Gospel, and He is drawing men and women from other parts of the world to minister here. They have a genuine calling and I believe this also demonstrates that God has not turned His back on the people of Europe.

Optimism, Pessimism or Realism?
Ministry in Britain is a challenge. But things have not regressed to the days when the first Christian set foot on British soil. Can you imagine that at some point in history there was only one, single, solitary Christian in the land?

Maybe it was Claudia, daughter of Caractacus. Maybe it was an unknown Roman soldier. Perhaps it was a missionary sent deliberately to the then furthest corner of the Roman Empire.

What we do know, is that over hundreds of years the Gospel would spread, it would be corrupted by some but held to faithfully, if only in great simplicity, by a remnant. Revivals and reformations would bring many back to orthodoxy. Generations would eventually come who would, by God’s grace, become part of a powerhouse that would send and take the Gospel around the globe! The influence of Christianity would permeate society, law, government, education, language, and literature.

And it all began with one.

If God’s work could begin with one believer in the land long ago, then surely we can hope for God to do a mighty work with the many faithful saints that labor here today.

This article first appeared on Reach the Isles.