The Resurrection of Christ, Part 4

By Daniel Brown

The Resurrection of Christ

A Letter Defending the Bodily Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Corinthians 15:28

Part Four

G. Question #4: We find a further confimration of the spirit body resurrection in 1 Peter 3:18, “For Christ died once for all time for sins, a righteous person for unrighteous ones, in order to lead you to God. He was put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit.” (NWT)

As you already know, I do not believe the New World Translation to be a trustworthy translation of the Bible. The majority of Christian theologians in the world would also agree to this. This passage is yet one more reason why we find the NWT to be unreliable. The passage should read.

For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:1 Peter 3:18

The words, “in” (NWT) and “by” (KJV) make a great impact on the meaning of the passage. The NWT has the phrase “in the spirit” because the Watchtower Organization wishes to support its belief in the Spirit-body resurrection of Jesus Christ. This passage is, in reality a supporting passage for the Holy Spirit’s involvement in the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. Jesus was resurrected from the grave by the Holy Spirit of God. Romans 8:11 agrees:

But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.
Romans 8:11

Now I would like to ask you a few questions. I would appreciate receiving an answer to these questions as well as the others I have posed.

There are many factors of the resurrection of Jesus Christ which we should consider. Already mentioned are the Prophecy Factor and the Pneuma Factor. The prophecies of Jesus’ resurrection (from both Jesus himself and from Old Testament prophets) declare a physical resurrection. The Pneuma Factor explains the difference between Spirit and Spiritual.

We have not yet considered the Persecution Factor. The persecution of Christians since the time of Jesus Christ was based upon one main reason, namely, the claim that Jesus Christ was physically resurrected.

In my study of 1 Corinthians, I also read verses 30-32:

And why stand we in jeopardy every hour? I protest by your rejoicing which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily. If after the manner of men I have fought with beasts at Ephesus, what advantageth it me, if the dead rise not? let us eat and drink; for to morrow we die.

I would like to ask you the questions which the Apostle Paul asked:

• Why stand we in jeopardy every hour?
• What advantageth it me, if the dead rise not?

Christians have suffered under persecution since the time of the New Testament. Among other horrific forms of persecution, they have been stoned, crucified, burned at the stake, drowned, and shot to death. According to history, Peter, Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Thaddeus, and Simon the Zelot were crucified. James, the son of Alphaus was stoned. John was exiled to the island of Patmos. According to the historian Josephus, the Apostle Paul was decapitated.

Every Apostle of Jesus Christ was persecuted because of the gospel. The gospel they preached, according to 1 Corinthians 15, was the substitutionary sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross, his burial, and his resurrection.

Paul claimed that the reason he was in jeopardy every hour was because of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

G., do you really believe that these 12 men, along with a multitude of other unnamed followers of Jesus Christ, were persecuted to the death for believing in the resurrection of Jesus Christ in a spirit-body? Does this make sense to you?

A spirit-body resurrection is not a miracle. Muslims could say that Muhammed resurrected in a spirit-body. Buddhists could claim that Buddha resurrected in a spirit-body. Every false religion could make such claims and have no need to verify their claims. This is the reason why Jesus Christ gave infallible proof of his physical resurrection.

If Jesus Christ rose from the dead in a spirit-body, there is no reason for the persecution of hundreds of thousands of Christians throughout history. However, if Jesus Christ rose physically from the dead, his resurrection is truly a miracle. Such a miracle would confirm the exclusivity of Jesus Christ as the only true God and Saviour.

I would like to consider one more factor: The Priest Factor, or The High Priest Factor. Please read 1 Timothy 2:5-6

For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

The New World Translation reads as follows:

For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus, who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all—this is what is to be witnessed to in its own due time.

This passage begs the question, "Is Jesus Christ (the mediator of believers) a man, in this present time (as it is translated in the NTW), or not? “

I would like to refer once again to your statement, “The Bible is enough for me.” If the Bible says that Jesus Christ is presently “man”, and at the same time called “God” and “Lord”, what should we believe?

Jesus Christ’s ministry as Mediator necessitates that He would be a man. If He were not a man, He would not be a reliable High Priest. Jesus is still the “God-man”. He is 100% man and 100% God at the same time.

The following passage gives us the details of the High Priestly ministry:

Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession. For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin. Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.
Hebrews 4:14-16

According to this passage, Jesus Christ is a great high priest because he can be touched with the feeling of our infirmities. This describes his earthly life. From His birth to His death on the cross, Jesus experienced everything that a man experiences without one time committing sin. For this reason, we can approach the throne of grace with boldness. We have comfort and boldness before God because we know that Jesus understands us.

We also see in Hebrews 5, that the High Priestly ministry of Jesus Christ began as he was on earth.

As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec. Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and

supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that he feared;
Hebrews 5:6-7

Please read the entire chapter of Hebrews 7, in which Jesus is compared with Melchisedec. Please consider the likenesses between Jesus and Melchisedec.

• Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually. (v. 3)

• Could you please explain, neither beginning of days, nor end of life;?

• ... abideth a priest continually... - My understanding of this phrase is, what he began on earth he continued in heaven. How can he be a “Priest” in heaven if He is not a man?

And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest, Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life. For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec. For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.
Hebrews 7:15-19

• Thou art a priest for ever - The Lord Jesus Christ is still a priest, and will be a priest forever.

• An angel cannot be a priest, especially the High Priest. This is yet another clarification of the fact, that Jesus Christ is the same today as He will be throughout all eternity. He does not change. He was never an angel, nor will he be an angel.

And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death: But this man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood. Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them. For such an high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens;Hebrews 7:23-26

The Lord Jesus Christ has an unchangeable priesthood because he continueth ever. He is just as much a High Priest today as he was in Gethsemane. He does not change.

Because He is eternal, and our eternal High Priest, he is able to save sinners to the uttermost.

For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham. Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.Hebrews 2:16-17

• If Jesus was already an “angel” in the past, why does the Scripture say, he took not on him the nature of angels ?

• If an angel cannot be a merciful and faithful high priest, how can Jesus be the eternal High Priest?

There are a multitude of passages that declare the deity and eternality of Jesus Christ. There are also a plethora of passages which present a physical resurrection. As you know, it has been months since I have promised you an answer to your questions. I could send much more time with this subject, but if you choose to reject the many verses I have offered you in order to support your own belief system, I fear there is nothing else I can do for you. I will continue to pray for you.

Dearest G. I care very much for your soul. I believe God led me to present the true gospel of Jesus Christ to you.

Jesus is the true God. He took upon Himself the form of a servant, so He could pay for your personal sin debt. He resurrected from the dead physically and ascended into Heaven. He is still alive today! He desires to save you from your sin. Call out to Him! Trust in Him! Repent! Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved!

Missed Part 3? Find it here: http://baptistwriters.com/blog/2019/3/29/the-resurrection-of-christ-part-3

The Resurrection of Christ, Part 3

By Daniel Brown

The Resurrection of Christ

A Letter Defending the Bodily Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Corinthians 15:28

Part Three

G. Question #3: (1 Corinthians 15:35-57) - Please concentrate on verses 40-45.

Before I answer this request I would kindly ask you to take your own advice, and read the entire chapter. It has been often apparent to me that your organization abuses God’s Word, because you do not read the Bible in its entirety. I have gladly read, not only 1 Corinthians 15, but the entire book of of 1 Corinthians. I would only recommend that you do the same.

There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial: but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another. There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption: It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:

It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
1 Corinthians 15:40-45

My understanding is that you believe a “spiritual body” cannot be physical. Do you understand the difference between “spirit” and “spiritual”, or do you not make this distinction?

In the greek language, the word “Spirit”, in the sense of an invisible essence, entity or being, (regardless of whether it is written in reference to God’s Spirit or man’s spirit) is translated Pneuma.

However, the word “Spiritual” is not translated Pneuma, but Pneumatika. It actually refers to lordship, or being under the leadership of something or someone. That which is “spiritual”, in this passage, is someone under the control of a “Spirit” (The Spirit of God), yet not actually a spirit himself.

Paul wrote about this in 1 Corinthians 2:12-16, when he described the difference between the spiritual and natural man. Please read this passage through.

Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. Butthe natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.
1 Corinthians 2:12-16

• What meaning does the word “spiritual” have in this passage?• Does it refer to someone who is not in a physical body?

Christians should be controlled by God’s Spirit, yet they are not spirits. They are spiritual.

1 Corinthians 15:40-45 also explains that whatever is “sown” will be “resurrected”. This means that whatever goes into the earth will come back out. This is fundamental to the teaching of the resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15.

We must answer another question when we claim that Jesus Christ did not physically rise from the dead:

• If Jesus did not rise physically from the dead, where is his body?

It would probably be good for you to read the history of the Watchtower Organization on this subject. It seems as if there are differing answers from the Watchtower concerning this question. Perhaps the variation in responses is due to the absence of an actual settled answer. Perhaps the Watchtower organization is unable to give a settled explanation to the location of Jesus’ body, because the Bible actually teaches a physical resurrection from the dead.

The Bible explains that Jesus Christ was physically or bodily resurrected from the grave.

Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him (David) , that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne; He seeing this before spake of the

resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.
Acts 2:31

Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body.
John 2:19-21

And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you. But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit. And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat? And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb. And he took it, and did eat before them.
Luke 24:36-43

Jesus said very clearly that he was not a spirit. However, you contradict him and say that he was a spirit. Who is correct? You? The Watchtower? Religion? or Jesus Christ? I choose to believe what Jesus said.

We must have a good contextually scriptural reason for contradicting (or “re- explaining”) the words of Jesus Christ in order to strengthen our doctrine. We have no need to seek a extra-biblical explanation for what happened to Jesus’ body, because the Bible has already declared that Jesus Christ was resurrected and that he ascended into Heaven.

You wrote once to me, “the Bible is enough for me.” If this is true, what is the biblical explanation for the disappearance of Jesus’ body, if he was indeed not physically resurrected?

G. Question #3: (1 Corinthians 15:35-57) - Please concentrate on verse 50... (CONTINUED)

Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
1 Corinthians 15:50

Context is king! How can I understand this verse in comparison with the abundance of scripture that explain a physical resurrection? I only have to read the context. My friend, reading the scripture contextually seems to be the problem with your misunderstanding of scripture. You make many claims about the Bible, yet when we look at the context, your claims are contradicted.

What type of “flesh and blood” is being referred to in this passage? God makes the distinction in the previous verses

All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.
1 Corinthians 15:39

We see that there are differing types of “flesh”: men, beasts, fish and birds. There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial:

1 Corinthians 15:40a
• What is the flesh of celestial body? (Read verse 42)

So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
1 Corinthians 15:42

We have before us the great distinction between that which is heavenly (celestial) and that which is earthly (terrestrial).

Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption. Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.
1 Corinthians 15:50-54

The question is then, “How can corrupt flesh inherit the kingdom of God?” Paul gives us the answer:

Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed(v.51)...we shall be changed. (v.52) For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. (v.53)

Because you have a better handle of the German language, maybe you could explain the word “anziehen” (put on) better to me. When something is “put on” or put over something, does it mean that that which is underneath ceases to exist, or disappears?

Paul explains further in 2 Corinthians 5:1-5

For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed upon with our house which is from heaven: If so be that being clothed we shall not be found naked. For we that are in this tabernacle do groan, being burdened: not for that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life. Now he that hath wrought us for the selfsame thing is God, who also hath given unto us the earnest of the Spirit.

It appears to me that the “corruptible” will not disappear, but will be changed into something incorruptible. Think of the words, “changed”, “put on”, “clothed”, “not be found naked”, “unclothed” and “clothed upon.”

The hope of the Christian is the resurrection of Jesus Christ. We receive hope from realizing that Jesus Christ is risen, and from his promise, “that where I am, there ye may be also”. We know that those who have placed their faith in Jesus Christ will be with him in Heaven. Without the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ, we have no hope.

I can say with Job,

For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth: And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me.

Flesh and blood will indeed enter heaven, but not corruptible flesh. God will glorify the corruptible. The Daniel that will one day be buried in the earth, will surely be brought back out again, and will spend eternity with God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Missed Part 2? Find it here: http://baptistwriters.com/blog/2019/3/22/the-resurrection-of-christ-part-2

The Resurrection of Christ, Part 2

By Daniel Brown

The Resurrection of Christ

A Letter Defending the Bodily Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Corinthians 15:28

Part Two

G. Question #1: If Jesus Christ was raised in his physical body, why did his disciples not recognize him immediately when they saw him, after he was raised?

If we examine the text, we find the reason for their inability to recognize Jesus immediately. Please see Luke 24:16 & 31.

• But their eyes were holden that they should not know him. (v.16)
• And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight. (v.31)
How do you read this? What do you think of the phrases, “their eyes were holden”, and then, “their eyes were opened, and they knew him”?
“their eyes were holden” reveals that the matter is entirely with the “sight” of the disciples, and not at all with the body of Jesus Christ.

We also read in Luke 24:45, “Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,”. Jesus opened their understanding just like he opened their eyes. To this I would like to add, that my prayer for you is that God would also open your understanding concerning the Lord Jesus Christ. Even as you read the scriptures, you are unable to see Him as He truly is.

A fitting passage for you to consider is Matthew 14:25-27. Keep in mind that these events took place before the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, in his pre- resurrection body.

And in the fourth watch of the night Jesus went unto them, walking on the sea.And when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were troubled, saying, It is a spirit; and they cried out for fear. But straightway Jesus spake unto them, saying, Be of good cheer; it is I; be not afraid.

Rebuttal Questions:

• Does it mean that Jesus Christ really was only a “spirit”, “ghost”, or “angel”, because he was able to walk on the sea? A normal, physical body cannot do such miracles. According to your line of reasoning (ref. John 20:26-27), only an angel or a ghost can do such things.

• How is it, that Jesus’ disciples not recognize him? They said, “it is a spirit” (ghost). Does this mean that Jesus was only a spirit or an angel because they did not recognize him? Or, was their sight simply hindered?

• Mark 6:48-49 gives a parallel account of this event. Mark writes that Jesus, “would have passed by them. But when they saw him walking upon the sea, they supposed it had been a spirit, and cried out:” The next verse also reveals the reason why they could not recognize him, "and they were sore amazed in themselves beyond measure, and wondered. For they considered not the miracle of the loaves: for their heart was hardened.”

• There hardened heart kept them from seeing Christ correctly, and from remembering the miracle he had done with the loaves and fish.

G. Question #2: (John 20:26-27) - How was it possible for Jesus to suddenly appear in their midst, even though the doors were shut?

And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you. Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.
John 20:26-27

We could apply your question to every true miracle, “How is it possible?” The answer is simply, “Because He is God, and God can do impossible things.” However, it does not automatically follow that, because Jesus was able to appear in their midst, He was a ghost or an angel.

One of the common failures of cults and false teachers is the forming of a doctrine from a question. Healthy doctrine arises out of clear scriptural declaration, not from questions or claims which originate from fleshly reasoning.

Because you believe that Jesus’ appearance in the midst of the disciples automatically means that he was in a “spiritual” body, as opposed to a physical body, I would like to offer another passage for your consideration.

Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. John 1:48

This is a pre-resurrection occurrence in the earthly life of Jesus. You would agree with me that Jesus was in his human, physical body at this point. Jesus saw Nathanael even though he was nowhere near him. I believe this to be a proof of his Omnipresence. However, the question I have for you is, “How could he either be invisible in Nathanael’s location, or be capable of seeing Nathanael from a completely different location while in a normal, physical body?” Your reasoning would cause someone to believe that anytime Jesus did something supernatural in his post-resurrection-body was because he was, according to you, in a “spirit-body”. That is, however, contradictory to a belief in the incarnation of Jesus Christ, which you claim to believe.

This following passage would also challenge your interpretation of John 20:26-27:

And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.
John 1:13

Here are a few questions for this passage:

• Where was Jesus when he was speaking with Nicodemus, in Heaven, or

  on earth?

• How is it possible for Jesus to be standing in front of Nicodemus and

  speaking with him, yet at the same time be “in heaven”?

• Does it mean that Jesus was an “angel” or a “spirit” because he was

  able to do this miracle?

  I have presented these passages and questions to you to show you the weakness of your argumentation. When we want to contradict a doctrine that has existed since the time of Christ and his apostles, we have to have more solid scriptural evidence than this.

Missed Part 1? Find it here: http://baptistwriters.com/blog/2019/3/15/the-resurrection-of-christ-part-1

The Resurrection of Christ, Part 1

By Daniel Brown

A Letter Defending the Bodily Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ

1 Corinthians 15:28

The bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead is indeed the apex of the Christian faith. Every cluster of truth within biblical Christendom hangs upon the vine of the resurrected Saviour. If Christ did not raise from the grave, every person in every age who has claimed to follow the miracle-working Nazarene, and every martyr who has given his life for his faith in the risen Christ has been “duped”, “hood-winked”, and would rightly be the laughing stock of history. The resurrection of Jesus Christ from the grave truly changes everything!

What if you changed the doctrine of the resurrection though? What if, just for example, we claimed to adhere to a belief in the resurrection of Christ, but simply asserted that the resurrection was “spiritual”, not physical? Would it make a difference? Is it really that important that Christ rose from the dead in a physical body, as opposed to a spiritual one? In fact, its much easier to convince unbelievers of a spiritual resurrection than it is of a physical one. After all, there is no proof involved in a spiritual resurrection. Like every other prophet, from every other religion, from every historical time period, the claims of Christ would not need to be substantiated if they only existed in an invisible spiritual realm.

The reality is, this seemingly minor change to the doctrine of the resurrection is quite possibly a more dangerous teaching than the outright denial of the resurrection. When dealing with subjects such as this, I am often reminded of the statement I heard Dr. Clarence Sexton make countless times during my college years, “The most dangerous lies, are the lies that are closest to the truth.” This statement is never more accurate, than in the context of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ.

The following is an English translation of a letter I wrote to friend of mine, who happens to be a part of the Jehovah’s Witness organization in Germany. Within almost two years, this friend and I met somewhat regularly to discuss the Word of God. For the most part, we kept the focus of our discussions to the person of Jesus Christ, although there were some instances in which we strayed off subject. Those particular conversations usually led to frustration on both sides. Although the Jehovah’s Witness defense of their teaching that Jesus Christ was not Almighty God is biblically irrational and weak, there was one passage of scripture that troubled me. It was a “problem passage” for me. My friend realized this, and took the opportunity to revert to this passage whenever he felt cornered. It was after a few bouts with this verse, and never really coming to grips with the context surrounding it, that I settled in my heart to dig deeper.

I would like to request the following of each reader:

• Please pray for my friend. Since presenting him with the letter, he has

  completely cut off communication with me. I truly desire to see him come to faith in the true and living Saviour, Jesus Christ. My hope is that the Holy Spirit would take the Word of God which I have shared with him and continually bring it to his remembrance; highlighting every fallacy of the Watchtower Organization, and the great need of his soul for redemption.

• Prayerfully seek out those who are caught in the grip of cultic teaching. The Watchtower Organization and others like it may be enemies of the cross, but those who belong to them are blind, eternal souls who are in desperate need of God’s grace. They will not be saved through debate, or rude one- liners. However, God will use the gracious, faithful testimony of a Spirit-filled witness of Jesus Christ to draw them to Himself.

• Reply to me. If you have a different perspective on the passage, or on the commentary of it; or, if you simply want to share another scriptural truth that has helped you in witnessing, please send it to me. I look forward to your feedback.

  In Christ, Daniel J. Brown

Letter written on November 28, 2017

Dear G

Finally I am able to return to our theme. I am very sorry that it took me so long. The last weeks have been quite hectic, yet very productive weeks.

The topic: “The Resurrection of Jesus Christ” is weighing heavily on my heart. I believe according to Paul’s teaching, that the entire hope of the Christian is inseparable from the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 15:17-19, “And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished. If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.” Truly, all faith in Jesus Christ is in vain, as well as the hope for forgiveness of sin, if Jesus Christ did not raise from the grave.

Surely you would agree that this is the central theme of the Christian faith. However, your question is not “is there a resurrection?”, but “What does the resurrection actually mean?” I have very carefully read the Bible passages that you sent me, and have compared them with the overall scriptural teaching of the resurrection. I found that the teaching of the Bible, including the passages which you recommended to me (1 Corinthians 15:35-57; Luke 24L15-32; John 20:14-26; 1 Peter 3:18) clearly reveal a bodily, physical resurrection. In this letter, I would like to explain the reasons why I believe in the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ from the grave.

As always, I want to remind you that I pray for your often. My prayer is that you would acknowledge the true God of the Bible, the Lord Jesus Christ, to receive forgiveness of sin and eternal life.

...my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.Romans 10:1-2

To begin, I would like to give an explanation of each passage your shared with me in the order in which you sent them to me, along with an answer to the questions you asked in relation to these passages. I have listed every verse. For this reason the letter appears quite long.

Question Passages #1: Luke 24: 15-32 and John 20:14-16

And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them. But their eyes were holden that they should not know him. And he said unto them, What manner of communications are these that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are sad? And the one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answering said unto him, Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these days? And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people: And how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him. But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done. Yea, and certain women also of our company made us astonished, which were early at the sepulchre; And when they found not his body, they came, saying, that they had also seen a vision of angels, which said that he was alive. And certain of them which were with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had said: but him they saw not. Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken: Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory? And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself. And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and he made as though he would have gone further. But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them. And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight. Andthey said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?
Luke 24:15-32
And when she had thus said, she turned herself back, and saw Jesus standing, and knew not that it was Jesus. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou? She, supposing him to be the gardener, saith unto him, Sir, if thou have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away. Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say, Master.
John 20:14-16

iProtest Part Seven

by Daniel Brown

The Conclusion

These are some principles that I believe should be, at the very least, considered before we stand-in, sit-in, walk-out, or take part in any protest.

The more I hear of Christians “standing-up” for their “rights”, the more I am convinced that we have completely lost sight of what it means to be a Christ-follower. Paul admonished the Ephesian believers, “Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children; And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour” (Ephesians 5:1,2). The phrase “followers of God” literally means, “mimickers”. We are to mimic or imitate, not just the actions, but the entire lifestyle of Jesus Christ. We are to be Christ-like.

Often, in the name of Christianity, we strive for public admiration, yet Jesus Christ “made himself of no reputation.” We demand to be seen and recognized, but our King “took upon him the form of a servant”. We challenge and even defy the God-given authorities in our lives, demanding our “rights”, yet the Sovereign Lord “became obedient”. Imagine this! The one who is “the life”, and the giver of life, willingly became “obedient unto death” Philippians 2:5-8). Does there not seem to be a disconnect between the Christian and his Christ?

In her book Have We No Rights?: A frank discussion on the ‘rights’ of missionaries, Mabel Williamson recalls hearing a Chinese missionary speak from his heart. “You know…” he said, “there’s a great deal of difference between eating bitterness [Chinese idiom for ‘suffering hardship] and eating loss [Chinese idiom for ‘suffering the infringement of one’s rights’].” He spoke of the adventurous experience of what some call “suffering” in missionary work. The relinquishing of daily comforts, to live a rugged lifestyle, all for the noble cause of rescuing some perishing folk; what Christian couldn’t find some enjoyment in that? He continued, “Eating bitterness’ is easy enough…that’s a thrill…another thing, however—another thing that I had never thought about came up to make trouble. I had to ‘eat loss’! I found that I couldn’t stand up for my rights— that I couldn’t even have any rights. I found that I had to give them up, every one, and that was the hardest thing of all.” Mabel Williamson expounded on this wise missionary’s words, “The missionary has to give up having his own way. He has to give up having any rights. He has, in the words of Jesus, to ‘deny himself’. He just has to give up himself.”

Why is it, that a foreign missionary must “give up himself”, but a child of God who is supposedly living the same Christian life at home must not? An attachment to this world, and in particular to the freedom of this country, has quite duped the western believer into thinking that he must fight for his “rights” at all costs. It would behoove us to remember, that our Christian brothers and sisters in other, less fortunate nations know nothing of the civil liberties we hold so dearly; yet, somehow, they remain faithful to preach Christ in their corners of the world. I think they would be confounded to discover how much time, energy, finances, and how many moral “exceptions” believers are making to protect those liberties.

Oh Christians! By all means, vote when it is time to vote! When the opportunity avails itself, speak out in favor of biblical moral principles. Make use of every means possible to advance any righteous cause, when it is, in fact, biblically right. Pray, as we are commanded to: For kings, and for all that are in authority. However, never forget to which King and country you belong. May our earthly public service be always secondary, in means, method and message, to our heavenly.

This has been the final part of a PDF entitled iProtest by Daniel Brown. For the entire PDF, please click here.

iProtest Part Six

by Daniel Brown

The Cure

“We are not going to move this world by the criticism of it, nor conformity to it, but by the combustion within it of lives ignited by the Spirit of God.” - Vance Havner

So, what do we do? Should we just sit on our hands? Should we say nothing? Should we do nothing while lives are being taken, people are being abused, and injustice is pervading every aspect of our society? Absolutely not! Why do we feel that the answer can only be found in the extremes? We are required by God to make a difference. It is our Christian duty, not to protest, but to proclaim. There is a difference. While demonstrations, adhering to the aforementioned criteria, are permissible, they are ultimately useless unless the Lord Jesus Christ is being preached to those on both sides of the issue.

The abominable preaching of “replacement theology” (the teaching that Israel, and the subsequent promises to Israel in the scriptures can be replaced with the church, a country, or any other entity) in our churches has raised a society to believe that we can somehow make this world “Christian”. This is not scriptural, and it is not God’s will. The world will not evolve into something better, or more Christ-like, when we protest and hold public demonstrations. To be sure, decisions will be made that may fix one problem, all the while making way for yet another. In 2 Timothy 3, Paul warned Timothy that the “last days” would be “perilous times” (dangerous). He said that things would get “worse and worse”, not increasingly better. Away with the idea that we can Christianize the nation through policies, politics, and protests.

How do we do “fix” this? What is the cure? It is very complex and very simple at the same time. The cure to the violence issue, the cure to racial discrimination, the cure to drugs, the cure to sexual abuse, and the cure to any other problem which is rooted in sin, is the preaching of the gospel. This was for Christ, complex. In fact, it was brutal. For us, it is simple. He had to come to earth and lay aside his glory to perish for the debt of unworthy sinners. We must simply repent and believe the gospel. Our mission is simply to proclaim salvation in His name.

No; preaching the gospel will not prevent all future mass murderers from killing people, but neither will restricting the rights of gun owners. Preaching the gospel will not prevent all mothers from aborting their unborn children, but neither will political policies. The best that a policy can do is to make someone’s world a better place from which he will go to Hell. This sounds harsh, but it is true. The preaching of the gospel of Jesus Christ however, can change that same person’s eternal destination. Subsequently, the clear proclamation of the gospel of Christ dramatically improves that person’s “world”, and that of those around him.

Our responsibility is not to make the world a better place from which to go to hell. It is to simply, with words and actions, preach Jesus Christ. How much more effective would our demonstrations be, if we used them as opportunities to challenge our fellow-protesters to search the Scriptures? How much more powerful would the difference be in our communities, if we would use the evil in the world as an opportunity to speak of our own sinful nature, and need for redemption through Jesus Christ?

It is the height of hypocrisy, and it is the cruelest of treatment to publicly give our voice to promote a social cause, if we are not using that same platform to preach Jesus Christ.

This has been the sixth part of a PDF entitled iProtest by Daniel Brown. For the entire PDF, please click here.

iProtest Part Five

By Daniel Brown

The Conduct

We must not allow our emotions, or our “conscience” to be our guide. We must surrender our opinions to the Word of God, and when we find that our argumentation is truly in line with the Bible, we must allow the Bible to interpret how we express it.

This is the “How?” question, being brought into perspective. We cannot speak of the Christian’s involvement in debate, without addressing Christian conduct. Setting aside the groups we choose to associate with, and assuming that we have actually unearthed a truly righteous cause, expressing ourselves in a Christ-like manner must be at the peak of our priorities.

Not all protests are necessarily evil. Surely, there must be social or political causes worth joining. If we can manage to align ourselves with biblical agendas and those who are not in obvious opposition to biblical truth; if we can find a way to get the message across so as not to hurt the name of Jesus Christ, or hinder the unsaved from coming to Christ, we are obligated to do everything in our power to help.

The typical protest however, is neither the place for a Christian, nor is it the practice of a true follower of Jesus Christ. Screaming, cursing, chanting rude phrases, damaging property, not listening attentively to the argument of our opposition, assaulting other people; these are the practices of many (not all) protests. Even the “peaceful” protests of our day, undermine Biblical principles. The recent protests against alleged police brutality are a perfect example of this. Even those that were not described as “violent”, were very disrespectful to established authority. The Bible is very clear, that God is the Establisher of government. The true Church of Jesus Christ has never rioted, nor has she taken up arms to oppose the government in order to promote Christianity. Remember, our cause is not political, but ultimately spiritual. The Lord Jesus Christ himself rebuked his apostle Peter for using the sword to “advance his kingdom”. He is building a church, not an earthly kingdom. Therefore, He advances His Cause through the preached Word of God, not political resistance. Even under great persecution, believers have stood with God’s Word, but “submitted themselves to every ordinance of man” (1 Peter 2:13).

We must not forget that the most noble of intentions do not justify the setting forth of principles that oppose biblical truth. Staging a “walkout” at a work-place, in a school, or in any other civil environment does not seem to be consistent with the Biblical values of respecting authority. The parent who seeks to raise his children in the “nurture and admonition of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4), would never permit such behavior at home. When the children feel that they have been unjustly treated, are they permitted to simply “walk-out”? It seems to be the equivalent of a “grown-up” tirade. If discipline is required to keep a young child from collapsing on the floor into a fit of screaming and crying, because he does not get his way, why would we effectively do the same thing in a more “civilized” manner? We do this, because we have justified our own tirades. Christian employees have joined strikes, and have vocally disrespected the authority of their God-given places of employment. Unions are filled with believers who, for more money, are willing to take part in any number of disrespectful displays of disapproval. Even our harsh criticisms of government authorities, regardless of what they may promote, often violate Christian conduct (Read Ephesians 5-6; 1 Peter 2; Colossians 3)

We are forced to consider what affect this will have on future generations. What of the effect it will have on our children’s view of the local church? Should we “walk out”, or stand in protest when we disagree with the Pastor, or another church leader? Where there is no respect for authority, there will eventually be no fixed authority. Every man will do that which is right in his own eyes. This is normal; even expected in the world. This is how the unregenerate world-system functions. He has no regard for God’s Word, for He does not know God. However, we are not speaking to the world. We are addressing believers. Our connection to Jesus Christ demands a dramatically different conduct than that of the world.

How can I get the point across in a way that is respectful, and does not encourage disobedience to the principles of Scripture? If I am to participate in a protest, is it to be performed in such a way as to adhere to company, school, and civil policy? Have I followed the principles of Matthew 18 to resolve the conflict: Attempting to first handle it privately, then in the presence of two or three witnesses, and finally, as a last resort, publicly?

This has been the fifth part of a PDF entitled iProtest by Daniel Brown. For the entire PDF, please click here.

iProtest, Part Four

By: Daniel Brown

The Consistency

One of Jesus Christ’s greatest criticisms of the Pharisees was their hypocrisy. In fact, the words “Pharisee” and “Hypocrite” are now used synonymously. He said of Pharisees, “they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. But all their works they do for to be seen of men:” (Matthew 23:4,5). He was teaching that the Pharisees, for their own personal gain, and to be seen of men would teach one thing, while ignoring another that might inconvenience them. Much debate today is like the reasoning of the Pharisees. We are all too concerned about advancing our agenda, but not so concerned with challenging the consistency of our arguments.

Although we have defined our terms, and chosen our sides, it is often a human failure to accuse without considering the consistency of the present argument with other major issues. In the gun control debate, the lives of the “innocent” are being threatened, and therefore must be protected at all cost. What seems to be a contradiction, or at least an inconsistency, is that the very ones lifting their voices for the cause of “safety” and “security”, have not so much as given a grunt in opposition to those organizations who have taken the truly innocent lives of unborn babies through the brutal act of abortion. We are speaking of Christians, not of the world.

Today, even in many Christian circles, the mention of an “Abortion” protest elicits criticism. The eyes roll, and the sarcastic comments of “extremism” or “fundamentalists” come pouring out. We know it is wrong to abort babies, but we would never hold up a sign, or march in front of an abortion clinic. After all, there are other ways to get your message out there than to have a “shouting match” with Planned Parenthood. Right?

Although it is a truly life- and culture-altering moral issue, opposing abortion is, however, still only dealing with the “here and now”. Even more disconcerting than our inconsistency in moral issues, is the Christian’s obsession with the physical threats being posed, real or imagined, while ignoring the impending eternal threat which the unregenerate face. How can we truly justify waving any banner for any cause, if we are not willing to lift the “banner of the cross”? How appalling it would be to watch those who possess the cure to cancer championing the fight against the common cold, while millions perish under the greater illness. Yet the only ones in the world who have the answer for man’s sin problem, and ultimate eternal damnation, Christians, spend their days fighting any number of lesser battles, all the while never giving a clear presentation of the gospel to the lost.

The concept of our argument must be consistent, not only with our own principles, but also with the emphasis God places upon it in Scripture.

This has been the first part of a PDF entitled iProtest by Daniel Brown. For the entire PDF, please click here.

iProtest, Part Three

By: Daniel Brown

The Company

Who are the protesters? What do they stand for? Is this protest part of a larger agenda (political, religious, anti-religious)? We have to work our way through the propaganda facade of “we are common people with a common message”. While this may be the genuine mindset of many of those joining in the supposed “fight for justice”, we must not be naive. We have to question everything, even our own associations, if we are to truly approach this objectively. In reality, the “who” (Company) of our demonstration, is possibly as important as the “what” (Cause)!

Psalm 1 outlines the “Blessed life”. Simply put, the truly “Blessed” person, avoids associations with those in opposition to God’s Word, and purposefully surrounds himself with those who love God and are obedient to Him. “The counsel of the ungodly....the way of sinners... the seat of the scornful” are God’s description of the type of company we should beware linking up with to promote a cause.

If we do not examine the “company” or the “crowd” with whom we are demonstrating, we will surely become someone’s pawn. As Christians, we do not adhere to anyone’s doctrine, outside of Christ. Why would I open myself up to being used by anyone to advance his agenda, other than the Lord Jesus Christ Himself?

The “gun-control” debate, for example, is touted by both sides to be a just cause. However, the thinking Christian steps back and questions the motives of the ones shouting the loudest. Regardless of our opinion in general, if we take the side of the political “right”, specifically giving our voice for the NRA, we will branded with Neo-Nazi groups like Ku-Klux-Klan, and other extremist groups. Is this really the portrait of Christ’s church that we want the world to see? On the other side, those who vocally join the fight against the NRA will most certainly be linked with groups like N.O.W., Black Lives Matter, NAACP, Planned Parenthood, the LGBT community in general, and several other groups who have openly expressed strikingly anti-biblical and anti-God views.

The Company principle is not as “minor” as siding with the political left or right on an issue. It is as major as deciding whether or not to join up with the outspoken opponents of God. We must use discernment.

For the sake of objectivity, and in an effort to keep our theme in focus, I am not advocating nor condemning a believer’s association with any one group. To be sure, there is “leg-room” on both the right and the left side of many (not all) political and social issues. However, “taking to the streets”, and sending “Tweets” in favor of any organization is a vocal stamp of approval on possibly everything that the said organization promotes. This is quite a statement, and one that must be carefully considered prior to any demonstration.

To be a friend of someone who is, simply put, a sinner in need of salvation, is not sinful. We should, in fact, do everything we can to have contact with the lost. This means, of course, that we should purposefully involve ourselves in the lives of those who do not know God, and even oppose his Word. How can the “light” affect the darkness, if it is hidden under the bushel of the “church-building” or “Church-only” events. We have to get out among the world to reach the world. This includes, but is not limited to abortionists, gays and lesbians, pro- and anti-gun activists, and even those with opposing religious backgrounds. However, we must distinguish the person from the agenda he promotes. We must not be deceived by the modern interpretation of “evangelism”, by thinking that if we join-in the causes of the world, we will somehow secretly surprise them into salvation.

Who are we joining to get our message across? If we are unable to say with confidence, that the all-encompassing goal of our “comrades” is one of true biblical righteousness, we must avoid it at all costs. If the cause is of the Lord, there will be a way to promote it, joining others who stand with the Lord Jesus Christ.

This has been the third part of a PDF entitled iProtest by Daniel Brown. For the entire PDF, please click here.

iProtest, Part Two

By: Daniel Brown

The Cause

Have we considered the actual reason for the protest? Can we express our concerns in clear, thought-out, simple sentences? Do our reasons for protesting or arguing align with the Biblical principles concerning the matter at hand? Perhaps the biggest question is, what (Big “C”) “Cause” is going to be promoted most through this protest?

One realization that we must come to, if we are going to be truly discerning, is that there is most always a greater Cause that will ultimately drown out the chants and the motivations of even the purest of demonstrators. In other words, the demonstrator may cry out one thing, but depending upon his associations, or non-associates even, who are using the same terminology, the world will hear something completely different than what is intended.

If we are not careful, we could also allow our good intentions, or those of our loved ones, to be mis-used to promote a cause that is damaging to the testimony of Christ, and is harmful to society at large. We should be cautious so as to keep ourselves from being postured to advance the movements of this world-system. Remember, the agenda of the world is the agenda of Satan himself. Beware that we do not carelessly give a helping-hand to a Cause led by the Prince of Darkness.

This point is vital for the Christian! For it is our Cause that penetrates every area of our lives. It is not simply something that will end when the argument dies down, and the crowds go home. For the Christian, our Cause is the motivation for private actions, how we operate our homes, how we function in the business world, and every other aspect of life. What is our Cause? A better way to ask it, if we are truly following Jesus Christ is, “What was Jesus’ Cause?”

The Lord Jesus Christ said, in John 8:28, “I do always those things that please him (the Father)” The apostle Paul explained it this way, “And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men;

Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ.” (Colossians 3:23,24). He said in another place, “Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God” (1. Corinthians 10:31). What is the (Big “C”) “Cause” of the Christian? It is to please and glorify the Lord! We must compare our agenda, our (little “c”) “cause”, with the ultimate (Big “C”) “Cause” of the One whom we claim to follow.

This has been the second part of a PDF entitled iProtest by Daniel Brown. For the entire PDF, please click here.

iProtest, Part One

By Daniel Brown

The disconnect between the 21st Century Christian and the Christ he claims to follow is glaringly obvious. This ever widening chasm between the two is apparent in his actions, yet perhaps more in his reactions. He stands in contrast to the proactive “prudent” man of the book of Proverbs, who sees the evil ahead and wisely addresses the issue before it overtakes him. Rather, the modern Christian is often caught off-guard; surprised by the evil of the day. Thus he stands in a defensive position, and in an effort to counter his lack of foresight, proceeds to do everything in his power to drown out the voice of his opposition; thus using the methods, means, and often even the message of the world to defend his position.

However, the committed follower of Christ is ever ahead of the game. He has found truths within the pages of Scripture, which address the evils of every generation before they are apparent to even the wisest of worldly minds. Thus his reaction to perceived injustice, is never based upon emotion, or the pressure of the moment, but upon principles found alone within the Word of God. These truths when applied to our efforts against evil, are not only concentrated on the problem at hand, producing temporary results; they rather cause us to view each situation as an opportunity to affect eternity.

Thus our associations, overall goals, the expression of our opinions and every other facet of argumentation will be consistent with biblical truth, the mission of the church, and with the person Jesus Christ himself. As we address the Christian’s role in public and private demonstrations, let us be mindful of our eternal citizenship, and of the King we are ultimately representing.

The Contradiction

The Christian, by nature of his identification with the Lord Jesus Christ, is required to reason upon the basis of scripture. This sort of reasoning pervades every area of life, including how he addresses opposing viewpoints. Modern reasoning, however, even in the context of the church, no longer takes place on the basis of the Word of God. Instead, the Bible is brought to our already-formed opinions in an effort to support them. This is, of course, in contrast with generations of Christ-followers who found the Word of God to be their sole source of faith and practice.

Could it be, that decades of non-contextual topical teaching, “Hobby- horse” preaching, and the exaltation of tradition above biblical truth has led to the seeming extinction of the biblical Christian? Or, in stark contrast, is it the Social Gospel; “name-it-claim-it”; “Jesus is my Homie” brand of Christianity which is to blame; which has exalted experience and feeling above Bible exegesis? Perhaps the more likely answer is that both are equally responsible. From one extreme to the other, the church has forsaken scriptural literacy for the immediate result of “success”. The high cost being: generations of “Christians” who, in thought, life-style, and reasoning, resemble nothing of the Christ of the Gospel records.

In the context of demonstrations (public and/or private), we may argue the hypocrisies and inconsistencies on either sides of any given issue. They are often present and abundant. However, this is not our purpose. Rather than simply determining which side has the more “just cause”, or if there is truly such a thing in the socio-political culture of our day, the true Christian is compelled to dig a bit deeper. We must determine the real problem if we are truly to “root it out”.

It is a natural process that the mind undergoes in the light of any unfortunate event, especially a life-altering tragedy. A million questions flood the mind; the most plaguing of which are those with no pre- packaged answer. Each person has his own way of facing these questions. His response may hinge upon a myriad of underlying equations, depending upon how the event has effected his life. Some will seek to circumvent the hurdle, by simply avoiding the questions. To them, the best way to avoid the disappointment and heartache is to simply ignore reality, and move on with life as it is. Others will attempt to conquer the “un-answerables” by looking outside of themselves to find culprits other than an obvious perpetrator. Blame must be placed upon someone, and “we will not stop until it the ‘guilty’ have been identified!” This “blame-game” produces a sensation of vindication, but provides no true peace and no satisfying answer. Still others will look at the event as it is: a horrible and unfortunate result of the Fall of man. They will examine their own lives to discover how they might prevent repeat instances, yet through the tragedy look for opportunities to evangelize the unsaved.

The modern “protest” culture seeks justice using a combination of the “blame-game” and a genuine desire for real solutions. The problem with this combination is that, while attempting to legitimately solve the problem, the finger is still pointed outwards. Any time we begin by looking at people for blame or answers, we will always come up short. For the Christian, the answer is not an outward one, which is to be discovered “out there somewhere”, but an upward one, which will be discovered as we seek the Lord in His Word. Again, we must ask ourselves, have we searched the Scriptures for a meaning behind this, and have we spoken with the Sovereign God who knew about the given event in eternity past. Outside of this formula, we may march, sit- in, stand-up, walk-out, or do any other number of public or private protesting and simply find ourselves dizzy and frustrated at the end of the day.

This has been the first part of a PDF entitled iProtest by Daniel Brown. For the entire PDF, please click here.